The second stage in product
development is idea screening. Idea screening is done to eliminate unsound concepts early prior to devoting resources
to them (Calantone, Benedetto & Schmidt, 1999). If done properly, this stage
can be the difference between success and failure as it is vital to select the
best possible idea in order to reduce the risk of wasting time and committing
resources to an idea set out to fail. Constructing idea portfolios, using a
decision matrix and performing a SWOT analysis are all tools that can be used
in the idea screening process. Developing a set of criteria to evaluate your
ideas against is primordial when screening ideas. Marketing, production,
development and financial factors must all be assessed (Earl & Earl, 1999).
The assessment of market opportunities for an idea in particular is important
when deciding whether or not to pursue its development (Thomas, 1993).
Analyzing market trends, segmenting the market and estimating market potential
and penetration are all key steps in evaluating an idea’s promise. Idea
screening must be done in the most objective way possible to select the idea
that has the most potential without personal preference affecting the process.
The
American aviation company Boeing, for example, construct product portfolios
when deciding which ones to pursue or not (Lacontora and Matthews, 2009). The
company distinguishes two phases within the idea screening process: the
learning phase in which risk and opportunity are evaluated and the discovery
phase where the business value of the idea is assessed and investment sources
are targeted. These portfolios help screen ideas for strategy alignment and
enable the company to identify ‘mature ideas’. Ideas become ‘mature’ once they
have gone through the phases and been evaluated against certain criteria. In an
industry where constant innovation is needed to stay ahead of the competition,
the idea screening process is a decisive step in product development as
investing in fruitless ideas can prove to be a major setback for Boeing and their
market share.
I used the
decision matrix as the basis of my idea screening process, evaluating 3 new
sport format ideas against a set of criteria: attractiveness, cost,
accessibility and differentiation. Each criterion I piped my ideas against was
carefully selected in order to determine which sport format had the most
potential to attract interest and break into the sport market. The criteria
were also weighted according to their importance. The attractiveness level of
each sport was weighted as the most essential because ultimately the goal is
finding out which sport will attract the most people. Cost was the second
criterion in order of importance, this includes the cost of participating in
the physical activity and the cost of setting it up. The third was
accessibility, determining which sport was theoretically available to the
largest audience. And finally differentiation, deciding which format was the
most unique from its competition. After marking each sporting idea against each
criterion in an objective fashion, the variation and combination of hurling and
tennis seemingly had the most potential.
Decision Matrix
|
||||||||||||||
Created by
|
Kilian Collins
|
Date
|
November 16th
|
|||||||||||
Summary of Decision
|
Idea Screening for a new sport.
|
|||||||||||||
CRITERIA
|
Results
|
|||||||||||||
Weights
|
3
|
2
|
1.4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attractiveness
|
Cost
|
Accessibility
|
Differentiation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAW SCORE
|
WEIGHTED SCORE
|
RANK
|
||
OPTIONS
|
Rank
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
RAW SCORE
|
WEIGHTED SCORE
|
RANK
|
|
Tennis/Hurling
|
7
|
7
|
4
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
47.6
|
1
|
|
Football/volleyball
|
5
|
7
|
7
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
43.8
|
2
|
|
Trampoline football
|
7
|
4
|
4
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
43.6
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
Calantone, R.J., Benedetto, A.D.
& Schmidt, J.B. (1999) ‘Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in New Product
Screening’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(1),
pp. 65-76.
Earle, M. and Earle, R. (1999) Creating New Foods, The Product Developer’s Guide. Oxford: Chandos
Publishing.
Thomas, R. (1993) New
Product Development. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lacontora, J. and Matthews, S. (2009) ‘Ideas to Innovation:
Idea Portfolio Management’, Portfolio
Management for New Products & Services Conference, Fort Lauderdale,
Florida, 25 Febuary. Available at: http://www.ppmexecution.com/wp-content/uploads/Ideas%20to%20Innovation%20-%20Idea%20Portfolio%20Management%20--%20PDMA%20Portfolio%20Conference%202009.ppt. (Accessed: 17 November).
Received
ReplyDeleteYou demonstrate a sound grasp of the idea screening concept and process, offering a very good explanation to accompany an initial definition. The example of idea screening in the second section is illuminating but do try to use a sport specific example to better showcase the concept in the sport industry.
ReplyDeleteYou offer a sound account of the decision matrix, howver, while you offer reference to your own attempt, this is not accompanied by discussion communicating to what degree the information generated has progressed your ideas.
You have a good written style and are able to communicate your thoughts well. A good effort.
62%
ReplyDelete